![]()
| <-- Return to Women's Home Page | <-- Return to Men's Home Page | <-- Return to Mixed Home Page |
![]()
If you have a question you'd like to have answered, please submit your question using our Feedback page
![]()
Question: Our match was rained out after the exchange of scorecards. After scheduling the makeup lines of play, one of my players is unable to make up the match. Can I substitute another player for the absent player or do I have to forfeit?
Question: What is the procedure for adding a player to a team?
Question: Adding a player that was on a roster at a higher level the previous season but played in no matches.
Answer: The Rules Chairperson had a request to allow a player to be added to a B1 team after the original roster had been sent in. This player had been on the roster of an A3 team the previous season. The player had played in no matches. This request was denied.
The December 2003 rules have been clarified and they state in order to be added to a team, "the player must have been on a roster in that Division for the player's last season in SCTL at or below the current level of the team the player is joining".
Line Judges and how they work
The SCTL does not provide linesmen or umpires for matches. If there is a conflict on the court because of line calls, a player may request line judges. In this case, the captain of each team will obtain a player or representative to be a line judge. These two line judges will stand at the net posts, one on each side of the court. They are to observe as play continues. They call no lines during play. If requested by one of the players they will then give their call. Unless there was a clear error, the player's line calls should not be overridden.
Question: What may a player do if the opponent is foot faulting?
Answer: Rules of Tennis: "In a non-officiated match, the Receiver or the Receiver's partner, may call foot faults after all efforts (appeal to the Server) have failed and the foot faulting is so flagrant as to be clearly perceptible from the Receiver's side." (page 11, USTA Comment: In the interest of sportsmanship and fair play, foot faults should not be called unless it is interfering with your play on the court).
Question: The question was whether a let could be played if a spectator screamed while she was serving.
Answer: No matter how much the distraction from a spectator --whether a cell phone or loud noise, I can find no rule indicating a let. I believe the action must go on with no let. We see it constantly at the professional level. However, action should be taken after the point to request the spectator to refrain in the future.
Question: The question was whether a let could be played if a players cell phone rings in the middle of a point.
Answer: Friend at Court, Tennis Rules and
Regulations: The player is not entitled to a let because the player caused
the disturbance by bringing the phone to the Court. If this is not the
first time that the phone has rung and if the opponent has requested that the
player turn the phone off, then the opponent may claim the point based on a
deliberate hindrance. (page 50, Case 18) If the phone ringing causes
a hindrance, and no comments were made earlier in the match requesting that all
cell phones be turned off, then the opponent may claim a let, provided the
opponent does so immediately)
● Frequently misunderstood rule submitted by Rick Calton of Suntree Country Club
Question. If a player receiving serve calls the ball out and then realizes that the ball was actually good, what is the proper action?
Answer. Out calls corrected. If a player mistakenly calls a ball "out" and then realizes it was good, the point shall be replayed if the player returned the ball within the proper court. Nonetheless, if the player’s return of the ball results in a "weak sitter," the player should give the opponent the point. If the player failed to make the return, the opponent wins the point. If the mistake was made on the second serve, the server is entitled to two serves. (Taken from the The Code. Making Calls # 12.)
![]()